PG&E Judge Wants to Know Why Power Wasn’t Cut on Line Linked to Wildfire

Spread it!


A federal judge wants PG&E Corp. to explain why it didn’t turn off power sooner to a utility line suspected of causing the second-largest wildfire in California history.

At a hearing Monday, U.S. District Judge William Alsup, who oversees PG&E’s criminal probation, questioned a PG&E troubleman who initially discovered that a tree had fallen on the line near the origin of the Dixie Fire. Alsup asked the worker, who the court wants to remain unidentified, why he didn’t consider shutting off power to the line while investigating the cause of the outage that occurred in a high-fire-risk area.

The troubleman said he initially didn’t see a tree on the line or signs of flames and needed to drive several hours before getting closer to the scene to investigate. When he arrived, he saw a tree leaning into wires and a small fire, which he tried to put out.

It took PG&E almost 10 hours to respond to the initial sign of trouble on the early morning of July 13.

“Wouldn’t it have been the prudent thing to do to turn that power off in case there was a tree on the line,” Alsup asked during the hearing. Alsup said it was possible that the tree could have caused a ground fault with electricity flowing through it and eventually igniting it.

He directed PG&E to identify the individuals who made the decision to respond to the event and answer his additional questions about the blaze by Friday.

“We share the court’s focus on safety and recognize that we must take a leading role in preventing future catastrophic wildfires,” PG&E said in a statement. “We also recognize the devastation caused by the Dixie Fire, and we are grateful to the first responders who continue to fight and work to contain the blaze.”

High Stakes

The stakes are mounting for PG&E if it’s found at fault for the Dixie Fire and others that have ravaged Northern California in recent years. The company is fighting criminal charges for a 2019 fire and facing a criminal probe for a 2020 blaze. Alsup’s scrutiny could put additional pressure on state regulators to escalate their oversight of the company. Meanwhile, if PG&E is found to have willfully disregarded public safety, it may be denied protection in a California wildfire insurance fund.

A firefighter monitors a fire as multiple structures burn in the Indian Falls neighborhood during the Dixie Fire near Crescent Mills, California, U.S., on Saturday, July 24, 2021. At more than 221 square miles in size, the Dixie Fire is now the largest wildfire in California.

Since its ignition, the Dixie Fire has consumed more than 960,000 acres while burning most of the Gold Rush-era town of Greenville. It was the first blaze in state history to burn from one side of the Sierra Nevada mountain range to the other. The wildfire has destroyed 1,329 structures and resulted in one death, according to the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection. The cause of the fire, which is 75% contained, remains under investigation.

Alsup has been scrutinizing PG&E’s role in sparking wildfires as part of his oversight of the company that stems from a 2010 deadly natural gas explosion. PG&E emerged from bankruptcy last year after its equipment was blamed for starting some of the worst blazes in California history, including the 2018 Camp Fire that destroyed the town of Paradise and killed 85 people.

“Your company is a convicted felon that poses a safety hazard to the state of California,” Alsup said to PG&E attorneys on Monday. He said his job is to “rehabilitate” the company until its probation ends early next year.

The case is U.S. v. PG&E, 14-cr-00175, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California (San Francisco).

Top photo: Flames consume trees during the Dixie Fire in Genesee, California, on Aug. 21. Photographer: Eric Thayer/Bloomberg

Copyright 2021 Bloomberg.

Topics
Catastrophe
Natural Disasters
Legislation
Wildfire

Interested in Catastrophe?

Get automatic alerts for this topic.



Source link


Spread it!

Comment box